Comparison

The only EU compliance vendor
that publishes its pricing.

Compare Arkē to the five vendors most European fintechs evaluate. Real numbers where they're public, honest gaps where they're not.

Arkē
EU-built
ComplyAdvantage
Sumsub
SEON
Onfido (Entrust IDV)
Nethone
Starting price (monthly) €149/mo Published. No call. Contact sales Contact sales From ~€199/mo Self-serve available Contact sales Contact sales
Pricing transparency ✓ Public ✗ Hidden ✗ Hidden ~ Partial ✗ Hidden ✗ Hidden
Go-live time 48 hours Weeks (enterprise onboarding) Days–weeks ~14 days Weeks (enterprise) Weeks (enterprise)
Bundled coverage
KYC / AML / TM / Fraud
✓ All four bundled Single platform, one price ~ AML + Screening
KYC separate
~ KYC + AML
TM add-on
~ Fraud + AML
KYC limited
~ KYC + ID verification
TM separate
~ Fraud / device intel
AML limited
EU regulatory specificity
MiCAR / AMLD6 / DORA / NIS2 / AMLA 2027
✓ All five regs Built for EU compliance first ~ AMLD6 / some MiCAR
DORA/NIS2 partial
~ AMLD6 / MiCAR
DORA not primary
~ AMLD6 focus
MiCAR emerging
~ KYC/AML regs
EU focus secondary
~ Fraud regs
EU AML secondary
API-first ✓ Yes All endpoints public ✓ Yes ✓ Yes ✓ Yes ✓ Yes ✓ Yes
Free trial / sandbox ✓ Live demos Screen · Monitor · Report ✗ Demo call required ~ Trial on request ~ 14-day trial ✗ Demo call required ✗ Demo call required
Headquartered in EU ✓ Yes — Greece ~ UK (post-Brexit) ✓ Cyprus ✓ Hungary ✗ US (Entrust, Canada) ~ Poland (Nethone)
acquired by Mangopay

Scroll right to see all vendors, or view side-by-side on desktop.

Sources: vendor public pricing pages, documentation, and regulatory filings as of May 2026. Competitor data marked with ~ is based on publicly available information and may not reflect custom enterprise agreements. "Contact sales" = no public pricing available at time of research.

Vendor-by-vendor breakdown

Where each competitor wins, and where Arkē does.

ComplyAdvantage UK-headquartered

The go-to for large financial institutions needing deep adverse media coverage and real-time sanctions screening at scale. Their dataset is genuinely mature — millions of structured entries across PEP lists, sanctions, and watchlists.

Where Arkē wins
  • Published €149/mo vs. undisclosed enterprise pricing
  • 48-hour go-live vs. weeks of onboarding
  • AMLA 2027 + DORA + NIS2 specificity built in
  • All three pillars (screen + monitor + SAR) bundled
Where they win
  • More mature adverse media database (10+ years of data)
  • Deeper enterprise integrations (Salesforce, SWIFT)
  • Established brand recognised by larger banks
Bottom line: ComplyAdvantage is the right call for Series B+ fintechs with six-figure compliance budgets. For pre-seed through Series A, Arkē gets you regulator-ready faster and cheaper — without the enterprise sales cycle.
Sumsub Cyprus-headquartered

Strong ID verification platform with good EU footprint. Particularly capable at document OCR and liveness detection at scale — if your primary need is onboarding identity checks with biometric verification, Sumsub is worth evaluating.

Where Arkē wins
  • Transparent pricing, no discovery call required
  • Transaction monitoring + SAR drafting bundled in
  • MiCAR + AMLD6 + DORA + NIS2 + AMLA 2027 coverage
  • Live sandbox — try before you buy, right now
Where they win
  • Stronger ID document verification at scale (100+ countries)
  • Biometric liveness detection is a core differentiator
  • More extensive no-code workflow builder
Bottom line: If you're running a high-volume KYC onboarding flow and biometric verification is critical, Sumsub has the depth. For fintechs needing end-to-end AML + TM + SAR without stitching together five products, Arkē is faster and simpler.
SEON Hungary-headquartered

Fraud prevention-first platform with some AML overlap. SEON's real strength is digital footprint analysis — email, phone, social media enrichment for real-time fraud scoring. Their published pricing is a genuine differentiator in the space.

Where Arkē wins
  • AMLD6 / MiCAR / DORA / NIS2 regulatory specificity is deeper
  • SAR draft generation — SEON doesn't do this
  • Transaction monitoring for AML typologies vs. fraud patterns
  • EU-first regulatory roadmap (AMLA 2027 already on the horizon)
Where they win
  • Best-in-class digital footprint / social graph enrichment
  • More mature fraud scoring (not just AML)
  • ~14-day go-live is a published, verifiable number
Bottom line: SEON and Arkē have some transparency overlap. The wedge: SEON owns fraud; Arkē owns compliance. If your primary regulatory exposure is AML, sanctions, and SAR filing, Arkē is the more purpose-built choice.
Onfido (Entrust IDV) US-owned (Entrust)

Onfido was the UK's best-known identity verification company before being acquired by Entrust (a US corporation) in 2024. The product is now branded Entrust IDV. Strong document verification, trusted by large UK and EU banks.

Where Arkē wins
  • EU-headquartered (Greece) — no Schrems II / data transfer exposure
  • Published pricing vs. mandatory enterprise sales cycle
  • AML + TM + SAR bundled; Onfido is IDV only
  • 48-hour go-live vs. weeks of enterprise onboarding
Where they win
  • Deep biometric identity verification (Atlas AI)
  • Wider document coverage (195+ countries)
  • Enterprise brand recognition with Tier 1 banks
Bottom line: Post-acquisition, Onfido/Entrust IDV is an enterprise play. If you need best-in-class biometric IDV and have budget + timeline, it's viable. For EU-based fintechs needing AML + TM + SAR under one GDPR-compliant roof, Arkē is the cleaner choice.
Nethone (Mangopay) Poland-headquartered

Nethone specialises in device intelligence and behavioural fraud detection. Acquired by Mangopay in 2022 — now primarily positioned as the fraud layer within Mangopay's payment infrastructure. Strong if you're already on Mangopay.

Where Arkē wins
  • AML + sanctions screening — Nethone doesn't do this
  • SAR reporting for regulatory filings
  • Standalone — not tied to a payment platform
  • Published pricing; Nethone requires sales contact
Where they win
  • Device fingerprinting and behavioural biometrics
  • Native integration with Mangopay for payment fraud
  • Proven track record in marketplace fraud prevention
Bottom line: Nethone and Arkē aren't direct competitors — they serve different compliance surfaces. If you need device-level fraud detection within Mangopay, Nethone makes sense. If you need AML, sanctions, and SAR under AMLD6, Arkē is the purpose-built answer.

Why this matters

Four of five competitors hide pricing. That means a sales call, a discovery deck, and a quote that takes weeks. By the time you're live with them, you'd already be three weeks into production with Arkē.

European fintech compliance isn't a luxury item. Pre-seed and seed-stage companies shouldn't need a sales team just to find out if they can afford a regulator-ready stack. We publish the number. You evaluate it, compare it, and start a pilot — no salesperson required.

Ready to go live in 48 hours?

No sales call. No discovery deck. Just compliance.

Book a 20-min call — we'll answer every question on this page.